“Note
to self: Never play dama with a math teacher!” - Journal/Text Message by Me
I’ve
been here long enough to know better then to assume the way I grew up with
something is the way it is everywhere else in the world. I stand corrected one
more time. In order to make sure others’ do not fall into the same assumption,
I’m going to explain how something I thought was standard-- isn’t, how my view
is changing, and what mathematicians have to do with any of it.
As a
kid on rainy Oregon days, middle school staff would sometimes have to make the
decision to have indoor recess. Often this involved having the lunch duty
people divide themselves between the gym and the neighboring multipurpose room.
Sometimes teachers would have to open up games in the classroom for recesses
not associated with lunch time. One of the common games to play was checkers.
The red and black board was quickly set up and black would always go first
(“Smoke before fire” as the saying goes). While Thomas could always win with chess,
I was amazing at checkers. I don’t remember who taught me the rules, but I
learned them quickly. Sometimes we would start with three rows and other times
two, it all depended on who was playing when.
Checkers.
If I had reliable internet I would look up the history of this game. Instead all I have is my computer’s
dictionary that states “check·ers (n)a board
game played by two people, each using 12 pieces (checkers). The object is to
jump over the opponent’s pieces and remove them from the board. (takes a
singular verb) (Encarta®
World English Dictionary © 1999 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Developed for Microsoft by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.) and the dictionary app which
adds “1. a small, usually red or black disk of plastic or wood, used in playing
checkers; 2. Also called, British, droughts; 3, a checkered pattern; 4. A
person or thing that checks.” Neither which are very insightful as to the
origin of the game, why red and black are the usual colors, and why the rules
are established as such. If any of you have time, I’d love to know what you
find out about it.
Here in
Tigray, Ethiopia “checkers” is called “dama.” The board used is drawn on the
back of a piece of cardboard or an old piece of wood. Occasionally I’ve seen
chess boards being used, but in Selekleka faded cardboard sketched out with a
ruler and colored in with a black marker is what we use. When asking the
hostess of the tea house for the board she will come with a stack of various
bottle tops. One person sets up their three rows with the labels showing and
the other turns theirs up-side-down making unmatched caps not matter at all.
The winner of the game before goes or you can flip a coin. Play starts;
however, there are some differences in rules that must be observed and planned
for.
1. If
you can jump you have to.
1b. If you don’t jump your opponent
takes your piece.
2. You
can jump backwards without being “kinged.”
3. Once
“kinged” you can jump anywhere along that line. So if there is four blank
spaces between you and opponent you can still jump them without penalty.
Overall
it looks the same, same board, same number of pieces, same objective. However,
once one sits down and watches the differences start to come to the surface.
The first time I played (a week or so ago) I was given lots of advice and
reminders about the rules. Tonight I played against Tesfay, a math teacher.
Unlike other math, Amharic, or physics, teachers that I played against before (and
pulled out some wins) strategy was clearly Tesfay’s strength. The best I could do
was tie once and lose the other four games. My trouble is in the first rule
partnered with the second. By pulling your opponent to jump one of yours you
can sometimes open up options to jump 2 or 3 of theirs. You can also jump
forward and backwards so you have to be aware how your opponent’s tiles move in
a different way.
I tried
to play checkers on my iPad afterwards and was quickly flummoxed by the
different rules. Something I was once a champion at (we did have competitions
in Middle School), I’m now baffled in two different sets of rules. What I do
know, is that learning and correcting assumptions is one of the best lessons
that Peace Corps has taught me. Things I’ve known for so long are being
challenged. I’m seeing things in a new way both about life and myself. By
rereading journals I can see how far I’ve come as a teacher and person, but
also acknowledge that I still have a lot of learning left to do. I hope my
assumptions continue to be challenged and refined.